Post by Avatar on Apr 10, 2024 10:43:19 GMT
...when they don't know what they talk about.
Ugh! Get past her arrogance. No, I mean it, she knows her subject. Stick through to the meat of her discourse. She is on to something as to how a person as equally arrogant as she is, makes a fool out of himself, by stepping into a field in which he is unqualified to comment. Thus, the single example reveals a general rule about commentary and scholarship in general. You can be a trained expert and comment outside your expertise, as is your first amendment right. But when you step outside your qualified area, your opinion, LIKE MINE, when I don't know jack diddly about a subject, is not valid.
My favorite rear end of the mule is Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Avatar
Ugh! Get past her arrogance. No, I mean it, she knows her subject. Stick through to the meat of her discourse. She is on to something as to how a person as equally arrogant as she is, makes a fool out of himself, by stepping into a field in which he is unqualified to comment. Thus, the single example reveals a general rule about commentary and scholarship in general. You can be a trained expert and comment outside your expertise, as is your first amendment right. But when you step outside your qualified area, your opinion, LIKE MINE, when I don't know jack diddly about a subject, is not valid.
My favorite rear end of the mule is Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Avatar