Post by Avatar on Jun 3, 2024 11:10:23 GMT
Via Hughes Net:
Summary, and plain English explanation: scientists, specifically planetary meteorologists plotted upper atmosphere band temperatures of our star system's planets against orbital periods to determine if a seasonal spike anomaly was Earth unique, or spread throughout the solar system. The seasonal anomaly was not Earth unique. Was it caused by variation in Sol's radiation and luminosity? (F cycle>= 21 years.) Nope. It happens for Earth yearly and for other planets at about the same time as Earth which means there is a "wind direction" involved as these bodies plow through it; whatever "it" is. These temperature spikes correlate to gravitational lensing effects caused Mercury, Venus, Moon, Earth alignments with the Sun in line with the galactic center. What the Murphy is streaming at us from the galactic center? There should be nothing coming from that direction.
arxiv.org/abs/2105.08719
What are Axion quantum nuggets? What kind of chicken are they?
journals.aps.org/prd/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.043012
arxiv.org/abs/2403.05608#:~:text=Anti-quark%20nuggets%20%28AQNs%29%20have%20been%20suggested%20to%20solve,density%20with%20an%20expected%20flux%20of%20about%200.4%2Fkm2%2Fyear.
In other words, the anti-quarks and the 'normal' antimatter that we should see in the universe, that we do not see, are locked inside weakly interactive massive particles, or WIMPs as captive phenomena.
I am trying to understand how this negates the annihilation problem and process.
Avatar
Summary, and plain English explanation: scientists, specifically planetary meteorologists plotted upper atmosphere band temperatures of our star system's planets against orbital periods to determine if a seasonal spike anomaly was Earth unique, or spread throughout the solar system. The seasonal anomaly was not Earth unique. Was it caused by variation in Sol's radiation and luminosity? (F cycle>= 21 years.) Nope. It happens for Earth yearly and for other planets at about the same time as Earth which means there is a "wind direction" involved as these bodies plow through it; whatever "it" is. These temperature spikes correlate to gravitational lensing effects caused Mercury, Venus, Moon, Earth alignments with the Sun in line with the galactic center. What the Murphy is streaming at us from the galactic center? There should be nothing coming from that direction.
arxiv.org/abs/2105.08719
What are Axion quantum nuggets? What kind of chicken are they?journals.aps.org/prd/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.043012
arxiv.org/abs/2403.05608#:~:text=Anti-quark%20nuggets%20%28AQNs%29%20have%20been%20suggested%20to%20solve,density%20with%20an%20expected%20flux%20of%20about%200.4%2Fkm2%2Fyear.
Search for anti-quark nuggets via their interaction with the LHC beam
K. Zioutas, A. Zhitnitsky, C. Zamantzas, Y. K. Semertzidis, O. M. Ruimie, K. Ozbozduman, M. Maroudas, A. Kryemadhi, M. Karuza, D. Horns, A. Gougas, S. Cetin, G. Cantatore, D. Budker
Anti-quark nuggets (AQNs) have been suggested to solve the dark matter (DM) and the missing antimatter problem in the universe and have been proposed as an explanation of various observations. Their size is in the {\mu}m range and their density is about equal to the nuclear density with an expected flux of about 0.4/km2/year. For the typical velocity of DM constituents (∼250 km/s), the solar system bodies act as highly performing gravitational lenses. Here we assume that DM streams or clusters are impinging, e.g., on the Earth, as it was worked out for DM axions and Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs). Interestingly, in the LHC beam, unforeseen beam losses are triggered by so-called Unidentified Falling Objects (UFOs), which are believed to be constituted of dust particles with a size in the {\mu}m range and a density of several orders of magnitude lower than AQNs. Prezeau suggested that streaming DM constituents incident on the Earth should result in jet-like structures ("hairs") exiting the Earth, or a kind of caustics. Such ideas open novel directions in the search for DM. This work suggests a new analysis of the UFO results at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), assuming that they are eventually, at least partly, due to AQNs. Firstly, a reanalysis of the existing data from the 4000 beam monitors since the beginning of the LHC is proposed, arguing that dust and AQNs should behave differently. The feasibility of this idea has been discussed with CERN accelerator people and potential collaborators.
K. Zioutas, A. Zhitnitsky, C. Zamantzas, Y. K. Semertzidis, O. M. Ruimie, K. Ozbozduman, M. Maroudas, A. Kryemadhi, M. Karuza, D. Horns, A. Gougas, S. Cetin, G. Cantatore, D. Budker
Anti-quark nuggets (AQNs) have been suggested to solve the dark matter (DM) and the missing antimatter problem in the universe and have been proposed as an explanation of various observations. Their size is in the {\mu}m range and their density is about equal to the nuclear density with an expected flux of about 0.4/km2/year. For the typical velocity of DM constituents (∼250 km/s), the solar system bodies act as highly performing gravitational lenses. Here we assume that DM streams or clusters are impinging, e.g., on the Earth, as it was worked out for DM axions and Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs). Interestingly, in the LHC beam, unforeseen beam losses are triggered by so-called Unidentified Falling Objects (UFOs), which are believed to be constituted of dust particles with a size in the {\mu}m range and a density of several orders of magnitude lower than AQNs. Prezeau suggested that streaming DM constituents incident on the Earth should result in jet-like structures ("hairs") exiting the Earth, or a kind of caustics. Such ideas open novel directions in the search for DM. This work suggests a new analysis of the UFO results at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), assuming that they are eventually, at least partly, due to AQNs. Firstly, a reanalysis of the existing data from the 4000 beam monitors since the beginning of the LHC is proposed, arguing that dust and AQNs should behave differently. The feasibility of this idea has been discussed with CERN accelerator people and potential collaborators.
In other words, the anti-quarks and the 'normal' antimatter that we should see in the universe, that we do not see, are locked inside weakly interactive massive particles, or WIMPs as captive phenomena.
I am trying to understand how this negates the annihilation problem and process.
Avatar